Talk:Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5: 30 days

Massachusetts Institute of Technology has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 22, 2005	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
May 10, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
December 16, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
January 14, 2007	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
July 29, 2008	Good article reassessment	Kept
August 27, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
October 4, 2010	Peer review	Reviewed
July 4, 2011	Good article reassessment	Kept
Current status: Good article

Engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Mid‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Massachusetts / Boston High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as High-importance).
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Boston (assessed as High-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Lithium-ion battery#Commercialization and advances|Lithium-ion battery efficiencies]] The anchor (#Commercialization and advances) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

WP:DUE / inclusion of relative prestige in lede

Dear @GuardianH: and @ElKevbo:, I was wondering if you could advise me on how to expand the “Rankings” section (I would also like to change it to “Reputation and rankings”) here. From the Stanford talk page, I gather that I may need material explicitly supporting the position that MIT’s reputation for innovation, wealth, and rankings have made it one of the most prestigious universities in the world (if eventually permitted back in, I wish to revise the lede statement to include wealth). This is what I have collected so far (pardon me for the messiness):

Wealth:
Rankings:
1. That rankings contribute significantly to prestige:
  - Research in Higher Education, 2004: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40197378
  - European Journal of Education, 2014: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26609201
  - Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2014: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43773471
2. That MIT accordingly ranks (academically, not by prestige or desire rankings) among the best institutions in the world:
  - Times Higher Education, 2011: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2011/world-ranking/commentary
  - The Guardian, 2012: https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2012/sep/11/qs-world-top-100-universities-data-mit-cambridge
  - Academic Ranking of World Universities, 2014: https://www.shanghairanking.com/rankings/arwu/2014
  - Forbes, 2023: https://www.forbes.com/sites/ceciliarodriguez/2023/07/06/the-worlds-10-best-universities-2024-revealed-5-in-europe-mit-at-the-top/?sh=4d20ffad2227 (MIT #1 globally)
  - CNBC, 2023: https://www.cnbc.com/2023/10/18/times-higher-education-top-20-universities-in-the-world.html (MIT #3 globally)
  - ARTU, 2023: https://research.unsw.edu.au/artu/artu-results (MIT #1 in aggregate ranking of ARWU, QS, THE)
Innovation / research (that MIT is perceived globally as a model for innovation and higher education):
- The Guardian, 2006: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/feb/22/highereducation.internationaleducationnews
- Cultures of Technology and the Quest for Innovation, 2006: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1btbxh8.7
- Science, 2007: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20051677
- Forbes, 2013: https://www.forbes.com/sites/carolinehoward/2013/09/10/the-worlds-top-colleges-2013/?sh=1b78e40a4eaf (“MIT blueprint”)
- Social Studies of Science, 2017: https://www.jstor.org/stable/48568896
- The Economist, 2020: https://www.economist.com/europe/2020/08/29/how-france-created-a-university-to-rival-mit
- The New York Times, 2023: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/04/magazine/affirmative-action-race-college-admissions.html (this one is rather anecdotal, though, so maybe it doesn’t belong, but I think it speaks to how many prospective students think about MIT and STEM)
That MIT is prestigious in general (non-academic rankings and more):
- Bloomberg, 2011: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2011-03-10/harvard-mit-ranked-most-prestigious-universities-study-reports
- Harvard Undergraduate Open Data Project, 2019: https://www.hodp.org/project/analyzing-college-prestige-and-virality-through-google-trends/ (although I can understand why an undergraduate project that hasn’t been peer reviewed might not qualify for WP:RS)
- Times Higher Education, 2022: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2022/reputation-ranking (MIT still in second on a survey explicitly targeting academics)
- Fortune Magazine, 2023: https://fortune.com/2023/03/16/national-decision-day-mit-top-pick-us-college-hopefuls-2023/

Let me know if any of these may help to resolve the WP:DUE body weight issue previously encountered!

Cheers, Marcustcii (talk) 13:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I worry that you are begging the question. You'll make more progress and we'll get a better article if you first find high quality sources that discuss the university's reputation and then summarize what those sources say (as opposed to only looking for sources that support the conclusion that you've already assumed). ElKevbo (talk) 23:33, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, sorry! What if I put aside all talk of rankings for now and focus on finding more articles like the ones I linked from JSTOR (excluding the KAIST one, which certainly reads far more like a newsletter) discussing the type of STEM-focused education MIT represents and its general reputation? Would that fit with the high quality sources that might improve the article, or do those journal articles I linked not yet meet the standards we’d want? Marcustcii (talk) 00:23, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, being a veteran scholar of higher education yourself (whereas I am interested in the field but have little experience to show for it), do you have any recommendations as to where I could start finding the type of sources you’re talking about? Is there a specific set of journals or databases that you might recommend? Marcustcii (talk) 00:29, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ElKevbo: I’ve found two more sources relating to this university in general: Etzkowitz’s MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science and the less MIT-focused The Rise of American Research Universities: Elites and Challengers in the Postwar Era by Graham and Diamond. Etzkowitz in particular seems to have written extensively about MIT’s role in the development of American higher education — would you consider that as (a) an appropriately qualified source and (b) belonging more to the history of the institution or its reputation? (While I am mostly looking for sources on its reputation, I’d love to be able to contribute to any part of the article). Marcustcii (talk) 19:41, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I can't answer those questions without reading those materials. The publishers are certainly reputable so it looks like you're on the right track! ElKevbo (talk) 21:10, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nobel laureates

Says "As of October 2023, 101 Nobel laureates [...] have been affiliated with MIT", but the linked list includes only 24 such laureates. The linked list does include a disclaimer about different methods of counting and possible consequent "inconsistency" in numbers, but 101 to 24 seems a blatant contradiction rather than an "inconsistency". 2A00:23C8:7B0C:9A01:AD4B:6795:4308:4857 (talk) 01:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Updated MIT seal and logo

MIT has updated its logo and seal designs. Can one of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology page owners please contact me so I can provide the updated files? My office manages MIT's brand system. Thank you. Bblender (talk) 13:59, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria due to the two orange "more citations needed" banners from 2021 and the "update needed" banner at the top of "Faculty and staff". Is anyone interested in addressing these concerns, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 22:36, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]