Talk:Chengdu J-10

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Chengdu J-10. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Chengdu J-10 at the Reference desk.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chengdu J-10 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / Asian / Chinese

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

Egyptian order

Previously the article mentioned the confirmed Egyptian order of the J-10C; it was later removed for some reason, i added it back Thehistorianisaac (talk) 04:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it was removed again. A few days ago there was news that Egypt received the first batch. 136.142.159.18 (talk) 21:36, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As a reminder, editors seeking to add or modify information here need to source their edits to a reliable source. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 23:26, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes and it's already confirmed on multiple sources, why it is always being removed in wikipedia? Can someone just update this article with this new confirmed piece information? 196.130.177.13 (talk) 06:26, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how it works. The responsibility of providing reliable sources is on the person seeking to insert the information. Without doing so, you've not provided "confirmed" anything. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 07:51, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yes i understand, but i think it's already verified and cited by multiple sources on web whether western outlets or chinese ones. I can name and send you many right now if you want to check it yourself, both in english, arabic, chinese and other languages

I can add it myself here on wikipedia but i'm not an expert on editing 😅 196.130.177.13 (talk) 08:27, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Where are all these sources then - do they count as WP:RS - most "sources on the web" are not usable on Wikipedia.Nigel Ish (talk) 16:03, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

External links

I've removed the external links that were in violation of WP:ELNO. These are:

These links violate rule #1 of external links to avoid: the site should not merely repeat information that is already or should be in the article. If these are suitable for inclusion, please find a way to bring them in-line with the text, ensuring that they are appropriate and reliable first (some of these links clearly are not suitable as sources).⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 07:11, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]